Novelglue Novelglue

Applications / Meniscal Repair

Repairing the meniscus
so people keep walking.

A recombinant protein that bonds in a wet field and drives cell proliferation — an augmentation for tears that sutures alone cannot heal.

Development stage: the meniscus data on this page come from preclinical (animal) studies conducted with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kagawa University. FP-121 is an investigational material and has not been approved as a medical device or regenerative medical product. Efficacy and safety in humans have not been established.

The Social Challenge

Worldwide, 364 million knees
are losing the ability to walk.

The meniscus distributes load across the knee. A knee that loses it moves toward wear, and mobility, participation and independence are stripped away in sequence.

364 M
people living with knee osteoarthritis

One of the leading causes of disability on earth

11.5 M
healthy life-years lost each year

DALYs attributable to knee OA, 2019

osteoarthritis risk after a tear

Long-term follow-up

$5.7–15 B
annual US cost of knee OA care

Downstream treatment cost

186 days
average sick leave per episode

Knee OA, Dutch workforce

From meniscal injury to loss of mobility, and the mobility, participation and independence that need to be recovered
What is lost is more than a knee: mobility (stairs, commuting, standing work), participation (sport, employment, caring for others) and independence (assistance, then long-term care).

Sources: GBD-based knee OA analysis, 2019 — 364.6M prevalent cases and 11.53M DALYs worldwide · Snoeker BAM et al., J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013 — 4-fold long-term OA risk · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2021 — US knee OA treatment cost · BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022 — 186-day mean sick-leave episode.

The Unmet Need

Treated or not, most of
these knees still wear out.

If the tissue is resected

3 in 4

had developed tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 20–30 years after meniscal resection. Resection relieves symptoms but does not protect the joint.

If the tear is repaired

23 %

pooled failure at five years and beyond. The inner zone has no blood supply, so a sutured tear heals with almost no biological support. Suturing closes the gap; it does not supply healing.

When repairs fail — share of all failures
0–2 years 64%
2–5 years 23%
> 5 years 13%

Redrawn from Schweizer C et al., KSSTA 2022. Two thirds of all failures occur within two years of surgery.

A representative course

16-year-old man, bucket-handle tear of the right medial meniscus. Reinjury and locking followed an inside-out repair, ending in resection — the sequence that leads to the figure above.

  1. 01 Inside-out repair
  2. 02 Reinjury & locking
  3. 03 Resected — the meniscus is gone

Sources: Paradowski PT et al., Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016 · Nepple JJ et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012 — pooled repair failure 23.1% at ≥5 years · Schweizer C et al., KSSTA 2022.

From Impossible to Solved

What no adhesive could do,
one protein now does.

Category A

Biocompatible, far too weak

Fibrin sealant reaches only 2–5 kPa in a wet field and degrades rapidly. It cannot hold tear-edge contact under load in a joint. Being blood-derived, it also carries consent requirements and supply limits.

Category B

Strong, hostile to cells

Cyanoacrylate bonds strongly, but its degradation products raise cytotoxicity concerns and it is stiff and brittle once cured. It does not become a scaffold for healing.

Category C

Right idea, wrong chemistry

Catechol adhesives depend on DOPA oxidation and chemical crosslinking inside the joint — chemistry left in the joint by design — and joint-level data remain at research stage.

The meniscus needs three conditions at once — wet adhesion, cell friendliness and biological activity. No existing material satisfied all three.

Molecular Design · FP-121

Gripping at both ends,
inviting cells in the middle.

Inspired by the mussel foot protein fp-1: adhesive domains at both termini and one functional domain in the middle. Approximately 27 kDa, expressed in E. coli — animal-free and scalable.

N-term

FP1

Adhesive domain
binds wet surfaces

Centre

FP2

Functional domain
cell adhesion & growth

C-term

FP1

Adhesive domain
binds wet surfaces

FP-121 = FP1 – FP2 – FP1 · approx. 27 kDa · recombinant, E. coli

01 Wet adhesion

FP1 grips a wet surface

Interacts with –OH, –NH₂, –COOH and –SO₃H groups on tissue, so the bond holds in saline and under load.

63 kPa

Tensile, in saline (Category A: 2–5 kPa)

02 Cell friendliness

FP2 invites cells in

The central domain interacts with cell adhesion factors, so cells attach, spread and divide on the glue layer itself.

4.7×

HeLa proliferation vs negative control

03 Biological activity

A protein, not a polymer

No cytotoxic monomer, no crosslinker left in the joint. Optional Tyr→DOPA modification adds metal-ion coordination when more grip is needed.

No in-joint chemistry

Approx. 27 kDa · E. coli · animal-free

Mechanism of Action · Hypothesis

Edges stay together,
cells move in.

01 · Mechanical effect

Tear-edge contact is maintained

Applied locally at the tear, FP-121 keeps the two surfaces in contact and stabilises the repaired site, so the knee provides a mechanically favourable environment for healing instead of shearing it apart.

Suturing alone cannot hold that contact.

02 · Biological effect

Synovial cells are invited in

Synovial-derived cells are thought to drive meniscal repair. FP-121 promotes cell adhesion and migration in vitro, so the adhesive layer acts as a scaffold that cells can colonise and remodel.

The adhesive layer becomes the scaffold.

Stabilisation and biological acceleration are not alternatives here. Novelglue delivers both.

Kim W, Onodera T, Kondo E et al., Am J Sports Med 2020;48:1406–1415 (synovial-derived cells in meniscal repair) · Kawakami Y et al., Materials & Design 2025;255:114153 (FP-121 cell adhesion and migration).

Preclinical Study · Design

We tested it against the
current standard: suture alone.

Treatment group

FP-121 + two sutures

Local application of 20 mg FP-121, followed by two vertical mattress sutures.

Control group

Two sutures only

The current standard of care for a longitudinal tear, with no augmentation.

Model & protocol

Animal
16-week-old male Japanese white rabbits
Model
Medial meniscus longitudinal tear (5 mm, anterior white–white zone)
Allocation
Treatment side randomised · n = 6 knees per group
Timepoint
Menisci harvested at 12 weeks
Endpoints
Macroscopic (modified Miguel score) / histology (modified Ishida score) / healing rate (bridging ÷ tear length)
Creating the 5 mm longitudinal tear while protecting the tibial cartilage
5-mm longitudinal tear, tibial cartilage protected
Two vertical mattress sutures placed in the meniscus
Two vertical mattress sutures

Kagawa University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery × Novelgen Co., Ltd. Presented at the Japanese Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (JSOA) 2026.

Results · 12 Weeks

At 12 weeks, the tear
had visibly closed.

01 · Macroscopic

Macroscopic appearance of the rabbit meniscus, suture-only group, with the tear line still open

Suture only

Tear line remains open

Macroscopic appearance of the rabbit meniscus, FP-121 group, with a continuous tear surface

FP-121 + suture

Tear surface continuous

Modified Miguel score: p = 0.03 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, n = 6 per group). FP-121 augmentation produced a significant macroscopic improvement over suturing alone.

02 · Histological bridging

H and E histology. Left: suture only, injured site separated. Right: FP-121, injured site well bridged
H&E — left: suture only, injured site separated; right: FP-121, injured site well bridged. Scale bar 500 µm.
Share of knees with bridging
Suture only (1/6 knees) 16.7%
FP-121 (5/6 knees) 83.3%

Modified Ishida score (0–6): median 3.5 versus 0 (p = 0.062). Bridging of the tear by repair tissue decides whether a meniscus survives.

Quality of the repair tissue

Safranin O staining showed fibrocartilage-like tissue with cellular components and matrix formation — not simple scar.

Bridging was seen in 5 of 6 knees, against 1 of 6 with suture alone. FP-121 changed it from the exception to the rule.

03 · Healing rate

Histological healing rate (mean ± SD, n = 6)
Suture only 8.3%
FP-121 + suture 50.1%

8.3 ± 20.4% with suture alone versus 50.1 ± 25.3% with FP-121 (paired t-test, p = 0.025).

Definition

Healing rate = healing length ÷ total tear length × 100. Histological healing was defined as bridging of the injured site by repair tissue.

50.1% vs 8.3% (suture only)

Scoring: Nakagawa Y et al., Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2015 (modified Miguel score) · Ishida K et al., Tissue Eng 2007 (modified Ishida score). Rabbit medial meniscus longitudinal tear model, 12 weeks postoperative. All results are from preclinical (animal) studies.

Competitive Analysis

The only option that scores
on all four requirements.

Benchmarked on the four requirements for a meniscal repair augmentation. Competitor products are anonymised by category, based on published literature and product labelling.

Requirement FP-121Recombinant marine protein Category AFibrin-based sealant Category BCyanoacrylate-type Category CCatechol · research stage
Wet adhesion 63 kPa tensile, in saline 2–5 kPa cannot hold under load Strong brittle once cured Strong depends on crosslinking
Cell compatibility Adhesion, growth, migration no chemical modification Good biocompatible × Toxic products cytotoxicity concern Concerns oxidation, crosslinking
Demonstrated healing 50.1% healing · 5/6 bridged rabbit meniscus, 12 weeks Limited durability insufficient × Not applicable no healing activity × No joint data research stage
Supply & logistics E. coli · animal-free ambient 12 mo · no consent Blood-derived consent, supply limits Synthetic stable supply Mostly extracted scale-up unsolved

Characteristics from published literature (Bochynska 2016; Kawakami 2025) and product labelling. FP-121 values from Novelgen internal data and the Kagawa University rabbit study.

Business Model

One vial per procedure,
on a surgery that
already exists.

Unit

Single-use consumable

One vial per meniscal repair, sold alongside the suture system the surgeon already buys. No capital equipment, no new technique to learn.

Cost base

Lean inputs

E. coli expression, animal-free inputs, ambient logistics. No donor plasma, no cold chain, no cell handling. Ambient, light-protected shelf life of 12 months.

Route

Direct, then licence

Direct in Japan; licence or co-development with orthopaedic and pharma partners in the US and Europe.

Two numbers, read together

$697M

What we sell into

The device market a vial is priced within (2030)

$5.7–15B

What we remove

Annual US cost of treating knee OA downstream

A consumable priced in the hundreds of millions can defer a burden measured in the billions. That gap is the case for reimbursement.

The chain we interrupt

  1. 465k

    partial meniscectomies a year in the US — tissue removed, not repaired

  2. 3 in 4

    develop radiographic knee OA within 20–30 years

  3. 1M

    hip and knee replacements a year in the US, the end of that chain

Sources: Katz JN et al., N Engl J Med 2013 · Paradowski PT et al., Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016 · Osteoarthritis Action Alliance · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2021.

Market Opportunity

One adhesive,
three orthopaedic markets.

A single E. coli expression platform supplies all three product classes. Meniscal repair is the entry point; cartilage and bone repair follow.

01 · Entry

Meniscus repair systems

$557M (2026) $697M

2030 forecast / CAGR 5.5%

We enter as an augmentation to suturing — no change of technique, just a higher healing rate on top of what surgeons already do.

Source: Grand View Research (2023–2030)

02 · Expansion

Cartilage repair & regeneration

$1.73B (2025) $3.28B

2030 forecast / CAGR 13.7%

Scaffold and fixation for articular cartilage defects. Fibrocartilage is the fastest-growing segment at over 14% a year.

Source: Mordor Intelligence (2025–2030)

03 · Core

Bone putty & graft substitutes

$0.9B (2024) $1.35B

2030 forecast / CAGR 6.0%

Fixing sub-5 mm fragments in comminuted fractures, and β-TCP bone putty. Joint research with Kyoto University (AMED seed H).

Source: Bone graft substitute market survey (2024)

Global Expansion · Sequence

Proven in Japan, expanded
across Japan, Europe and the US.

01 Proof

Japan

2026–2028

  • Top-tier academic partnership with Prof. Ishikawa at Kagawa University, targeting First-in-Human through an investigator-led trial
  • Substantial public funding secured — Prof. Ishikawa (Kagawa University) is a grantee of AMED translational research seed A, hosted by the Hokkaido University hub
  • A vast patient population in a super-aged society — over 25 million people with knee osteoarthritis
  • Accelerated approval for regenerative products — conditional, time-limited approval brings innovative therapies to market early
02 Price anchor

United States

Value anchor

  • The largest and highest-priority market — rising obesity and sports injury give the US the world's largest potential population for knee cartilage repair
  • Premium price levels — the flexibility of US pricing allows the fastest recovery of our initial investment
  • First-mover advantage — we establish the brand with surgeons and take market share early
  • Fastest route to global reach — securing the demanding FDA approval first strengthens filings in Japan, Europe and Asia
03 Breadth

Europe

Partner access

  • The world's second-largest market, with strong demand for high-value biopharmaceuticals
  • Multi-country entry from a single review — EMA approval opens all 27 EU member states at once
  • A direct contribution to cost containment — fewer joint replacements makes the health-economic case easiest to prove
  • Access through universal coverage — national health insurance listing secures broad, stable, long-term volume

Why we can ship globally

Ambient logistics, animal-free supply, one manufacturing platform.

What we need from partners

Clinical sites abroad, regulatory counsel per region, distribution reach.

IP coverage

Composition-of-matter patents in national phase in Japan, the US and Europe; a use patent for meniscal adhesion is filed.

Path to Market

Three phases from rabbit
data to First-in-Human.

  1. Phase 1 2026

    Specification & regulatory alignment

    • Test-article specification: purity, potency, lot-to-lot variation, stability
    • Repeat the rabbit meniscus study and add time points (4 and 24 weeks)
    • PMDA consultation on the regulatory category and GLP study design

    Specification fixed · PMDA position

  2. Phase 2 2027

    GLP safety & large-animal PoC

    • Full ISO 10993 biological safety package under GLP
    • Large-animal meniscus model (sheep, pig) for PoC and adhesion strength
    • Design of the non-inferiority / superiority trial against suture alone

    Filing-ready safety package

  3. Phase 3 2028+

    First-in-Human & global filing

    • Investigator-led trials at Kagawa and Kyoto, then company-sponsored
    • Regulatory: Japan → Europe (CE / MDR) → United States (FDA)
    • Expansion into cartilage and bone repair, plus licensing

    FIH started → market approval

Biological Safety

A safety package with
a 2,100× margin.

Biological safety testing to ISO 10993

Cytotoxicity
IC50 1.08 ± 0.30 mg/mL Done
Genotoxicity
Done
Hemolysis
Done
Irritation
Done
Implantation
Done
Sensitization
In progress
Degradation
Planned

Results above are research grade. Regulatory filing requires repetition under GLP, planned for Phase 2.

1.41 g/kg

Estimated LD50, acute toxicity

2,100×

Margin over intended dose

Non-blood · animal-free

Produced recombinantly in E. coli, so viral and prion transmission risk does not exist in principle. The patient consent form required for fibrin glue is unnecessary.

Cell migration

In a BALB 3T3 scratch assay, cell migration is promoted from 11.2 µg/mL upward — the material supports wound healing rather than impeding it.

Team & Collaborations

The designers of the molecule,
and the surgeons who use it.

Lead clinical site · Principal investigator

Masakazu Ishikawa, M.D., Ph.D.

Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery · Kagawa University

Grantee, AMED translational research seed A (2025–26, Hokkaido University hub)

Directs the meniscal programme: study design, surgery and evaluation in the rabbit model, and the clinical route to First-in-Human. Senior author of the JSOA 2026 study, with Ryuichi Isozaki and Masaki Mori performing surgery, histology and scoring in-house.

Novelgen Co., Ltd.

  • Atsushi Ogura, Ph.D. — Founder & CEO. Designed the FP-121 molecule; co-inventor on the composition-of-matter patents.
  • Kouichi Kudo — CSO. IP strategy and business partnerships.
  • Nobue Shishio — Senior Fellow. Co-inventor on the composition-of-matter patents; co-author on the meniscus study.

Parallel indications, same platform

  • Kyoto University, Orthopaedics — bone adhesion & putty (AMED)
  • Two further medical schools — soft-tissue and hard-tissue adhesion programmes

One protein, four clinical programmes: evidence from each site compounds across the platform.

Intellectual property

Recombinant protein with adhesive and functional properties, and compositions containing it

Application
JP 2023-030567 (2023.02.28)
International
PCT/JP2024/007452
National phase
Japan · US · Europe — entered
Applicant / inventor
Novelgen Co., Ltd. / A. Ogura et al.

Composition

FP-121 sequence and architecture

Method of use

meniscus, cartilage, bone repair

Manufacturing

DOPA conversion, purification

Formulation

excipients and stabilisation

Differentiated from prior art fp-151 (2007) and fp-131 (2011) by domain architecture and EGF activity. A use patent covering meniscal adhesion is filed.

Our Commitment

A knee that holds is
a life that keeps moving.

A woman walking freely along a riverside path

Surgery can cut, remove and stitch. It cannot make tissue hold. Novelglue does.

One vial, added to a suture procedure surgeons already know. No donor blood, no cold chain, no cell handling — so it reaches the hospitals that need it, not only the ones that can afford it.

OA risk after a meniscal tear

Physical health — keeping the joint people walk on

20–29

Peak age of incidence

Mental health — young patients get their life back

11.5M

Annual DALYs from knee OA

Social health — mobility is participation

12 mo

Ambient, light-protected shelf life

Economic health — reachable where surgery is scarce

Step. Connect.
Live.

We are seeking capital and partners to reach First-in-Human: clinical sites in the US and Europe, regional regulatory counsel, and an orthopaedic or pharma partner for distribution.

引用文献 / References

  1. [1]

    Isozaki, R., Shishio, N., Kudo, K., Mori, M., Ogura, A., Ishikawa, M. (2026) Investigation of the therapeutic effects of marine adhesive protein in a rabbit medial meniscus longitudinal tear model , Japanese Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (JSOA) .

    香川大学医学部 整形外科 × 株式会社ノベルジェン。ウサギ内側半月板縦断裂モデルにおける FP-121 の非臨床試験。

  2. [2]

    Kawakami, Y. et al. (2025) Development of the FP121 series: Hybrid proteins mimicking marine adhesive proteins with cell adhesion and proliferation activity , Materials & Design , 255 , pp. 114153 .

    View on ScienceDirect →

    Novelglue (FP121 シリーズ) の基盤論文。細胞接着・増殖活性・スクラッチアッセイ等の一次データを含む。

  3. [3]

    Kim, W., Onodera, T., Kondo, E. et al. (2020) Role of synovial-derived cells in meniscal repair , The American Journal of Sports Medicine , 48 , pp. 1406–1415 .

    半月板修復において滑膜由来細胞が果たす役割。FP-121 の生物学的作用仮説の裏付け。

  4. [4]

    Paradowski, P. T. et al. (2016) Osteoarthritis of the knee after meniscal resection: long-term radiographic outcome , Osteoarthritis and Cartilage .

    半月板切除から 20–30 年後、約 4 人に 3 人が X 線上の大腿脛骨関節 OA を発症。

  5. [5]

    Nepple, J. J. et al. (2012) Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years , The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) .

    5 年以上の追跡における半月板縫合の統合失敗率 23.1%。

  6. [6]

    Schweizer, C. et al. (2022) Meniscal repair failure: timing and risk factors , Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (KSSTA) .

    半月板縫合後の再断裂の時期分布 (0–2 年 64% / 2–5 年 23% / 5 年超 13%)。

  7. [7]

    Snoeker, B. A. M. et al. (2013) Risk factors for meniscal tears: a systematic review including meta-analysis , Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy .

    半月板損傷後の長期的な変形性膝関節症リスクが約 4 倍に上昇することを示す。

  8. [8]

    Nakagawa, Y. et al. (2015) Macroscopic evaluation of meniscal healing (modified Miguel score) , Osteoarthritis and Cartilage .

    本試験のマクロ評価スコアの出典。

  9. [9]

    Ishida, K. et al. (2007) Histological evaluation of meniscal repair tissue , Tissue Engineering .

    本試験の組織学的評価スコア (modified Ishida score) の原典。

  10. [10]

    Katz, J. N. et al. (2013) Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis , The New England Journal of Medicine .

    米国における半月板部分切除の実施規模および治療選択の議論。